|

The CO2/Greenhouse Gas/Global Warming
Theory
Is the CO2/Greenhouse Gas/Global Warming Theory science or
a sacred cow?
If CO2/Greenhouse Gas is science, then I can say I
don’t understand without making anyone wrong.
I'm not a scientist, but I understand science.
Mr. Honda, Mr.
Hyundai, Mr. Sonny and Mr. Gates understand science and don’t even have
college degrees. (Is the objective of education knowledge
or action?)
Discovery is my favorite part of science. It’s
like creation in reverse. You start with a theory. The theory becomes
a jig-saw puzzle, only there’s no picture on the lid. Then you hunt for
pieces. Some fit, some don’t. Some pieces make you throw away entire
sections of theory.
Thomas Edison is famous for failing 10,000 times on
his way to creating the light bulb. (Then he got “stuck” on D.C.
Electricity. That’s another story.)
I don't understand parts of the CO2/Greenhouse
Gas/Global Warming Theory. There is a BBC production on the
internet called The Great Global Warming Swindle that proposes
alternative theories. I don't understand all of them either.
I can't say the current theory is wrong because I
do not have an opposing theory. Finding fault is seldom a sign of
intelligence and never a sign of leadership.
I don't understand all the elements of the
CO2/Greenhouse Gas/Global Warming Theory and want to ask questions
without making anyone wrong or getting defensive. Science is void
of emotions.
If the CO2/Greenhouse Gas/Global Warming Theory is
science, questions will be welcomed.
If the Theory is a sacred cow, it is no longer
science.
|